By
Sampson I.M Onwuka
We have taken a better look at the
leading arguments on the transfer of virus from humans to other primates such as the Apes and the Chimpanzee and a transfer of virus from other primates to human beings in both epizootic and zoonotic biological proscriptions. But the argument has no stretched far enough and it is within the construct of independent human psychology and process of thinking to
It is this entangled web of consideration separating one form to another that determines the left and right of the cases involving HIV and human in context every situation, and above all, in context of the difference between attitudes to blood and body types in names of blood and virus profligate.
The primacy of the blood groups which separate a Chimp from a Gorilla, a Gorilla from a Human, to a narrow a channel of the body’s ability through the nasal cavity to manage its varying degrees of defense system which will help its existence on the merits and demerits of an infection status and use and abuse of HIV as a human virus independent of the environment in which it exist….
This argument has been advanced in many direction and by many medical experts that it is fitting to suggest that nothing remains of the doubts that humans and primates separately suffer from cold virus and influenza, but the components for any of the many primates
It is this entangled web of consideration separating one form to another that determines the left and right of the cases involving HIV and human in context every situation, and above all, in context of the difference between attitudes to blood and body types in names of blood and virus profligate.
The primacy of the blood groups which separate a Chimp from a Gorilla, a Gorilla from a Human, to a narrow a channel of the body’s ability through the nasal cavity to manage its varying degrees of defense system which will help its existence on the merits and demerits of an infection status and use and abuse of HIV as a human virus independent of the environment in which it exist….
This argument has been advanced in many direction and by many medical experts that it is fitting to suggest that nothing remains of the doubts that humans and primates separately suffer from cold virus and influenza, but the components for any of the many primates
Like we mentioned above, there are exception to this situation and one of which can argued from the composition of the highest density genes such those with the only carbon
copy of 22 sugar genes. This sugar complex tend to be ranked higher than others with tendency towards the release of insulin in the body, may be relevant in its variation of the population they tend to form and as such a given
biological population is probably one evolutionary pathway whose frequency is
lower than those of higher density and whose overall number of sugar complexes is 22.
In any case, there is a chance the total number of genes and biological functions that can be discovered in a section of Africa is equal to the total amount of genes – either through mitochondria or through the Y Chromosomal inheritance - to the amount of genes available in all of United States including those of Africans and African Americans.
Total amount of genetic information that can be found in a small city in Africa will match the total amount of genes available in all of Russia and all of China.
In any case, there is a chance the total number of genes and biological functions that can be discovered in a section of Africa is equal to the total amount of genes – either through mitochondria or through the Y Chromosomal inheritance - to the amount of genes available in all of United States including those of Africans and African Americans.
Total amount of genetic information that can be found in a small city in Africa will match the total amount of genes available in all of Russia and all of China.
As far as Nigeria, it is estimated
the Nigeria alone has more genetic diversity than any nation in the world. Why?
The answer is well known from all scientific information that Africans are
higher placed on the density of gene protein, a fact that has been taken for
granted yet probably useful in throwing all kinds of light on why for instance
a man such as Simon Flexner was right that all Polio Viruses are the same, and
why the attempt that at correlating the HIV variants to animals of the Upper
and Lower Apes kingdoms – the so called cousins – is not only misleading but
totally flawed.
For sure we may indicate that based
on half the process associated with genetic breakdown and studies; there is an
equal measure of the distribution of genes in theory which will not comply with
the tree version of the variant explication of human types and specie that
relates to HIV in all its form. But this variation between one variant of HIV and another, for instance between HIV 1 through HIV 40 and perhaps more expanded as the case may be, may be due to variants in human body and composition of genetic materials in human body.
Let us rehearse some of the information about human beings, that there is a tone of body types and differences between one pool of human genetic information and another, that the races as we have them today and the types of human beings as we have them from previous eras and have seen them from all encounters and from all works of life suggest a composition of human genetic materials and proteins that derive from parents. This is the nature of HIV and immune deficiency syndrome.
No one human is exactly the same in its order of genetic material - with or without respect to any source of vicariate event or epigenetic demonstrated by Jerry Frodo and Massimo Piatteli - Palmarini such that one person at one genetic end of a spectrum is different from the other at the opposite side of the spectrum, that leads from the fact that the differences between humans are based on present continuous cases of protein arrangement beginning from the Meiosis and conception to maturity relevant to hereditary.
I for one, do not need to shed all these light on the present fact that Charles Darwins' theories on human evolution is not wrong, but the pathway he eludes and derives his arguments from do not tow any useful biological construct saving for cases of cancer and deleterious manifestation as mentioned by many experts.
It is this variant that is a product of the many sorting processes in biology and why on primary level humans relate to each and at a certain level they differ. It leads elsewhere that attempt to transfer this minor changes in human beings to primates with argument based mainly on duration, fracture and adaptation, as if the biological construct need no magic to grow given its necessity to survive, is not expected to survive since the time frame separating one primate from another - in spite of archeological evidence is inviolable due to the constant energy structure of the world.
There are therefore no possible new creatures given the basic DNA structures underlining all animals on earth, there is therefore no possible difference between one animal from another in terms of time line and in terms of the age of dinosaurs whose basic animal structures contain as much underlining DNA as does all creatures including Hippopotamus and the varied humans and other primates. This fact need to be understood in other to score any chance of understanding HIV.
In my direct view - based on my many years of studies - nothing can account for differences in human being; both in nature of the races than the speciation of genetic materials. The relevancy of the statement is derived from some favored knowledge of history and from general and specific assumptions about current studies in genetic studies which tend to suggest separate existence of HIV structures with separate origins, whereas these HIV viruses and SIV viruses wouldn't have been an obstacle if we understood the genetic difference as a question of the region which it profligates than separate pathways.
If we can also put some measure of intellectual force in understanding that evolution or transfer of viruses from one primate to another is not easily achieved and may be depended on the particular nature of the virus especially the rapid and fast viruses such as Ebola or other airborne and injected viruses including for instance Polio Meningitis and not necessarily the Lentivirus or slow virus which adapts to its host and vary in its population of the creature.
A lentivirus adapts to its host, like oncogenes from Zaire chimps out of which a strain of the Polio virus was used in preparing the vaccination - cooked or alive. A strain of slow virus from any one of the primates does not easily transfer to other primates saving for direct cases of rapid profligate activity of the virus between gp 47 and gp 120.
Once we have become conversant with a Retro Virus such as HIV and its operational dynamic, it becomes self-perpetuating to relate the number of variants to a process as opposed to Spill overs. Put it bluntly, there is one form of HIV existing in the world, one strain - a personal dogma - that in spite of the assorted phenotypes of the HIV 1-7 (HIV 1-19) we may be looking to a degenerative protein quality of all Viruses as opposed to new types, such that a flu virus mirrors duplicity and its tendency towards new forms from old.
Let us rehearse some of the information about human beings, that there is a tone of body types and differences between one pool of human genetic information and another, that the races as we have them today and the types of human beings as we have them from previous eras and have seen them from all encounters and from all works of life suggest a composition of human genetic materials and proteins that derive from parents. This is the nature of HIV and immune deficiency syndrome.
No one human is exactly the same in its order of genetic material - with or without respect to any source of vicariate event or epigenetic demonstrated by Jerry Frodo and Massimo Piatteli - Palmarini such that one person at one genetic end of a spectrum is different from the other at the opposite side of the spectrum, that leads from the fact that the differences between humans are based on present continuous cases of protein arrangement beginning from the Meiosis and conception to maturity relevant to hereditary.
I for one, do not need to shed all these light on the present fact that Charles Darwins' theories on human evolution is not wrong, but the pathway he eludes and derives his arguments from do not tow any useful biological construct saving for cases of cancer and deleterious manifestation as mentioned by many experts.
It is this variant that is a product of the many sorting processes in biology and why on primary level humans relate to each and at a certain level they differ. It leads elsewhere that attempt to transfer this minor changes in human beings to primates with argument based mainly on duration, fracture and adaptation, as if the biological construct need no magic to grow given its necessity to survive, is not expected to survive since the time frame separating one primate from another - in spite of archeological evidence is inviolable due to the constant energy structure of the world.
There are therefore no possible new creatures given the basic DNA structures underlining all animals on earth, there is therefore no possible difference between one animal from another in terms of time line and in terms of the age of dinosaurs whose basic animal structures contain as much underlining DNA as does all creatures including Hippopotamus and the varied humans and other primates. This fact need to be understood in other to score any chance of understanding HIV.
In my direct view - based on my many years of studies - nothing can account for differences in human being; both in nature of the races than the speciation of genetic materials. The relevancy of the statement is derived from some favored knowledge of history and from general and specific assumptions about current studies in genetic studies which tend to suggest separate existence of HIV structures with separate origins, whereas these HIV viruses and SIV viruses wouldn't have been an obstacle if we understood the genetic difference as a question of the region which it profligates than separate pathways.
If we can also put some measure of intellectual force in understanding that evolution or transfer of viruses from one primate to another is not easily achieved and may be depended on the particular nature of the virus especially the rapid and fast viruses such as Ebola or other airborne and injected viruses including for instance Polio Meningitis and not necessarily the Lentivirus or slow virus which adapts to its host and vary in its population of the creature.
A lentivirus adapts to its host, like oncogenes from Zaire chimps out of which a strain of the Polio virus was used in preparing the vaccination - cooked or alive. A strain of slow virus from any one of the primates does not easily transfer to other primates saving for direct cases of rapid profligate activity of the virus between gp 47 and gp 120.
Once we have become conversant with a Retro Virus such as HIV and its operational dynamic, it becomes self-perpetuating to relate the number of variants to a process as opposed to Spill overs. Put it bluntly, there is one form of HIV existing in the world, one strain - a personal dogma - that in spite of the assorted phenotypes of the HIV 1-7 (HIV 1-19) we may be looking to a degenerative protein quality of all Viruses as opposed to new types, such that a flu virus mirrors duplicity and its tendency towards new forms from old.
One of the principal reasons for this fast and slow virus profligate in the human body is the activity of the antigens. It seems that certain cells in the human body only allows us to subdue new materials entering the body and the body's reaction to foreign antigens is particular the work of AB antigen and its suicide mission and the role of T-cells. It is easy for Gorillas for instance to withstand any hint of HIV from human beings even as co-primates given the very structure of their blood types such as B blood group only, that they have a longer stay on processing new infection or exposure and may die from SIV, immune deficient related diseases and other versions of lentivirus without notice given the granulations of the B cells and its propensity to condition the virus in their system. These types of viruses are necessarily cancerous, necessarily a leading course of animal degenerate condition such as blood cancer such as sickle cell and HIV which I for one believe peritonea.
The issue of graduation and duration between humans and gorillas can hardly be true, for all intents of understanding that slow viruses tend to split as quickly as does fast viruses that memory cells play important role in harnessing and understanding the nature of these cells - especially in humans - and in animals as the case would suggest - that some of the enzymes such as Cortisone may be a natural occurring material in the body from a blood sequence naturally rich in B cells.
It may seem to suggest that the B part of the blood may have to do with a promoter of some sort and not necessarily a gene that superficially code for any type of blood crystal structure hence what they call memory cells has all the cards in understanding Gallo arguments and Montagnier arguments and has all the points about the reasons why HIV may invade immune system, may lack vaccination, may above all be a virus that has both cells in its mast, especially the human cells encased in the prophage, for instance E.Coli or Pneumocystis which excrete a peculiar kind of sugar (complexes) that dissolves sugar complexes especially Thymus structure in a basic DNA strand, capable of temporarily altering the final structure for hemoglobin and distribution of oxygen in the blood leading to collapse of the protein and death of red blood cells.
There are several lines of defense in immunity complex of any virus and creature - which from a personal dogma is made possible through the testis of the male where the earliest or primitive reproductive processes began.
Whereas no relationship seem to exist between people with ABO blood types and those with Alzheimer’s - a different argument - which is a process of decay and plaque accumulation from failure of the blood to remove calcium or other minerals from the brain and the blood - a case no different dysfunctional blood plasma and oxygen storage and other forms of human and animal structure.
It may mean that those with O bloods in of itself, do not behave like say Chimpanzees for reasons of body structure and composition and those without B type in human beings do not behave like Gorillas for similar reasons which requires minimum interpretation.
If the body fails to remove any major mineral from the blood if settles somewhere in the cells or in the walls of the cells, and over time, it builds up like plaque in the cell and give problems which the body did not anticipate, a case no different from body fats and cholesterol which advanced HIV cases suffer and HIV drugs capable of dissolving these residues in the body also drains the body.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The issue of graduation and duration between humans and gorillas can hardly be true, for all intents of understanding that slow viruses tend to split as quickly as does fast viruses that memory cells play important role in harnessing and understanding the nature of these cells - especially in humans - and in animals as the case would suggest - that some of the enzymes such as Cortisone may be a natural occurring material in the body from a blood sequence naturally rich in B cells.
It may seem to suggest that the B part of the blood may have to do with a promoter of some sort and not necessarily a gene that superficially code for any type of blood crystal structure hence what they call memory cells has all the cards in understanding Gallo arguments and Montagnier arguments and has all the points about the reasons why HIV may invade immune system, may lack vaccination, may above all be a virus that has both cells in its mast, especially the human cells encased in the prophage, for instance E.Coli or Pneumocystis which excrete a peculiar kind of sugar (complexes) that dissolves sugar complexes especially Thymus structure in a basic DNA strand, capable of temporarily altering the final structure for hemoglobin and distribution of oxygen in the blood leading to collapse of the protein and death of red blood cells.
There are several lines of defense in immunity complex of any virus and creature - which from a personal dogma is made possible through the testis of the male where the earliest or primitive reproductive processes began.
Whereas no relationship seem to exist between people with ABO blood types and those with Alzheimer’s - a different argument - which is a process of decay and plaque accumulation from failure of the blood to remove calcium or other minerals from the brain and the blood - a case no different dysfunctional blood plasma and oxygen storage and other forms of human and animal structure.
It may mean that those with O bloods in of itself, do not behave like say Chimpanzees for reasons of body structure and composition and those without B type in human beings do not behave like Gorillas for similar reasons which requires minimum interpretation.
If the body fails to remove any major mineral from the blood if settles somewhere in the cells or in the walls of the cells, and over time, it builds up like plaque in the cell and give problems which the body did not anticipate, a case no different from body fats and cholesterol which advanced HIV cases suffer and HIV drugs capable of dissolving these residues in the body also drains the body.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment
sunsetstudios@hotmail.com